Un article du directeur de Liberté sur "Le mensonge de Dieu"
2 participants
Page 1 sur 1
Un article du directeur de Liberté sur "Le mensonge de Dieu"
Un article du directeur de Liberté sur "Le mensonge de Dieu"
Abrous Outoudert, le directeur du quotidien Liberté, a lu " Le mensonge de Dieu" de Mohamed Benchicou. Il dit ce qu'il en pense.
C’est une véritable saga que nous offre Mohamed Benchicou qui a troqué pour un temps sa camisole de journaliste pour celle plus ample mais qui lui va comme un gant ; celle d’écrivain.
J’avoue que j’avais une double appréhension quand j’ai eu le livre entre mes mains : d’abord celle de retrouver des récriminations de journaliste en mal de règlement de compte et ensuite le volume du livre (pas moins de 650 pages), un véritable dictionnaire.
Mais c’était plus qu’une encyclopédie documentée, agréable à lire et surtout bien écrite, avec beaucoup de poésie et surtout une escapade dans la fiction de notre histoire. Celle de ce pays à travers tout simplement une généalogie qui prend sa source chez Bélaïd de Tizi n’Djemaâ à Rafiq sacrifié comme kamikaze par les groupes islamistes, à l’âge de 13 ans. Nous sommes déjà en l’an 2007 alors que son arrière-grand-père a crapahuté sur tous les fronts, à la recherche de la liberté et de l’amour. Il a trouvé ce dernier mais la seconde tarde à venir et sa descendance qui prend le relais, sur les pas de l’ancêtre. De quoi tenir le lecteur que je suis en haleine jusqu’à la dernière page (653). Au départ, il y a Bélaïd, un Don Juan, rouquin qui tomber les femmes par son bagout, son courage et surtout par sa disponibilité à aller à la recherche de la liberté où elle se trouve. C’est-à-dire sur tous les fronts où il y a la guerre. Verdun et les autres. Tout cela pour l’amour de Joséphine, une Allemande d’Algérie, puis pour Manuela, l’Andalouse qui lui a donné un fils Djebril et offert une selle d’un général espagnol en agonie de réalisme ou d’utopie. Car “l’utopie est un handicap avant d’être un fourvoiement. Elle vous berce, le temps que le piège se referme sur vous.”(P 244). Son fils Djebril prend la relève du père et Yousef, celle de son grand-père et de son père. En quelque sorte le rocher de Sisyphe sur lequel la génération se trouve condamnée, par descendance jusqu’à Mahla, petite-fille de Yousef, adoptée ou de Zouheir, martyr de la guerre des Six Jours en 1973 ou de sa sœur Zoubida. Il y a aussi avec Joséphine et Manuela, Noah, Magdalena, Amira, Aldjia, Meriem et les autres comme Kheïra qui hante le cimetière pour demander protection pour son fils formaté kamikaze à 13 ans. Les personnages féminins tiennent une place prépondérante dans cette œuvre parce que comme dit l’auteur les grands chamboulements comme les crues ont lieu en automne et la femme y joue toujours un rôle primordial.
Au gré des chapitres, l’auteur fait des incursions de plus en plus répétitives sur la période des années 2000-2008 avec un personnage du DRS, colonel, devenu hadj sur le tas, quand il a compris qu’il avait tout faux. Dans cette saga, on fait la rencontre de Moufdi Zakaria en prison et surtout avec Messali Hadj qu’on sent déchiré entre le choix cornélien de choisir entre sa femme et ses compagnons de lutte. Le titre de ce roman historique a fait tiquer plus d’un alors qu’il est tiré d’une phrase qui, en fin de compte, résume ce grand roman qui rappelle celui de Souidi (Amastan Sanhadji). Et cette phrase qu’on trouve à la page 407 est la suivante : “Seul le mensonge de Dieu peut nous consoler de l’injustice des hommes.” Un bon sujet de dissertation aussi bien pour les candidats au bac que pour ceux qui s’interrogent. Ceux qui n’aiment pas le journaliste adoreront l’écrivain.
ABROUS Outoudert
Edition du Jeudi 28 Juillet 2011
Le mensonge de Dieu de Mohamed Benchicou, 653 pages, éditions Koukou et Inas.
Mohamed Benchicou dédicacera son roman, le Mensonge de Dieu, le samedi 30 juillet 2011 à partir de 14h à la librairie du Tiers Monde.
http://www.lematindz.net/news/4911-un-article-du-directeur-de-liberte-sur-le-mensonge-de-dieu.html
Abrous Outoudert, le directeur du quotidien Liberté, a lu " Le mensonge de Dieu" de Mohamed Benchicou. Il dit ce qu'il en pense.
C’est une véritable saga que nous offre Mohamed Benchicou qui a troqué pour un temps sa camisole de journaliste pour celle plus ample mais qui lui va comme un gant ; celle d’écrivain.
J’avoue que j’avais une double appréhension quand j’ai eu le livre entre mes mains : d’abord celle de retrouver des récriminations de journaliste en mal de règlement de compte et ensuite le volume du livre (pas moins de 650 pages), un véritable dictionnaire.
Mais c’était plus qu’une encyclopédie documentée, agréable à lire et surtout bien écrite, avec beaucoup de poésie et surtout une escapade dans la fiction de notre histoire. Celle de ce pays à travers tout simplement une généalogie qui prend sa source chez Bélaïd de Tizi n’Djemaâ à Rafiq sacrifié comme kamikaze par les groupes islamistes, à l’âge de 13 ans. Nous sommes déjà en l’an 2007 alors que son arrière-grand-père a crapahuté sur tous les fronts, à la recherche de la liberté et de l’amour. Il a trouvé ce dernier mais la seconde tarde à venir et sa descendance qui prend le relais, sur les pas de l’ancêtre. De quoi tenir le lecteur que je suis en haleine jusqu’à la dernière page (653). Au départ, il y a Bélaïd, un Don Juan, rouquin qui tomber les femmes par son bagout, son courage et surtout par sa disponibilité à aller à la recherche de la liberté où elle se trouve. C’est-à-dire sur tous les fronts où il y a la guerre. Verdun et les autres. Tout cela pour l’amour de Joséphine, une Allemande d’Algérie, puis pour Manuela, l’Andalouse qui lui a donné un fils Djebril et offert une selle d’un général espagnol en agonie de réalisme ou d’utopie. Car “l’utopie est un handicap avant d’être un fourvoiement. Elle vous berce, le temps que le piège se referme sur vous.”(P 244). Son fils Djebril prend la relève du père et Yousef, celle de son grand-père et de son père. En quelque sorte le rocher de Sisyphe sur lequel la génération se trouve condamnée, par descendance jusqu’à Mahla, petite-fille de Yousef, adoptée ou de Zouheir, martyr de la guerre des Six Jours en 1973 ou de sa sœur Zoubida. Il y a aussi avec Joséphine et Manuela, Noah, Magdalena, Amira, Aldjia, Meriem et les autres comme Kheïra qui hante le cimetière pour demander protection pour son fils formaté kamikaze à 13 ans. Les personnages féminins tiennent une place prépondérante dans cette œuvre parce que comme dit l’auteur les grands chamboulements comme les crues ont lieu en automne et la femme y joue toujours un rôle primordial.
Au gré des chapitres, l’auteur fait des incursions de plus en plus répétitives sur la période des années 2000-2008 avec un personnage du DRS, colonel, devenu hadj sur le tas, quand il a compris qu’il avait tout faux. Dans cette saga, on fait la rencontre de Moufdi Zakaria en prison et surtout avec Messali Hadj qu’on sent déchiré entre le choix cornélien de choisir entre sa femme et ses compagnons de lutte. Le titre de ce roman historique a fait tiquer plus d’un alors qu’il est tiré d’une phrase qui, en fin de compte, résume ce grand roman qui rappelle celui de Souidi (Amastan Sanhadji). Et cette phrase qu’on trouve à la page 407 est la suivante : “Seul le mensonge de Dieu peut nous consoler de l’injustice des hommes.” Un bon sujet de dissertation aussi bien pour les candidats au bac que pour ceux qui s’interrogent. Ceux qui n’aiment pas le journaliste adoreront l’écrivain.
ABROUS Outoudert
Edition du Jeudi 28 Juillet 2011
Le mensonge de Dieu de Mohamed Benchicou, 653 pages, éditions Koukou et Inas.
Mohamed Benchicou dédicacera son roman, le Mensonge de Dieu, le samedi 30 juillet 2011 à partir de 14h à la librairie du Tiers Monde.
http://www.lematindz.net/news/4911-un-article-du-directeur-de-liberte-sur-le-mensonge-de-dieu.html
Azul- Nombre de messages : 29959
Date d'inscription : 09/07/2008
Prophet Muhammad - The Most Influential Man in History
Prophet Muhammad - The Most Influential Man in History
from the book by Michael Hart
The following is from Michael Hart's book and lists Prophet Muhammad as the most influential man in History. A Citadel Press Book, published by Carol Publishing Group
Ranking of the twenty from the list of 100:
1. Prophet Muhammad
2. Isaac Newton
3. Jesus Christ
4. Buddha
5. Confucius
6. St. Paul
7. Ts'ai Lun
8. Johann Gutenberg
9. Christopher Columbus
10. Albert Einstein
11. Karl Marx
12. Louis Pasteur
13. Galileo Galilei
14. Aristotle
15. Lenin
16. Moses
17. Charles Darwin
18. Shih Huang Ti
19. Augustus Caesar
20. Mao Tse-tung
________________________________________
MUHAMMAD, No. 1
The 100, a Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History
by Michael H. Hart
My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels. Of humble origins, Muhammad founded and promulgated one of the world's great religions, and became an immensely effective political leader. Today, thirteen centuries after his death, his influence is still powerful and pervasive. The majority of the persons in this book had the advantage of being born and raised in centers of civilization, highly cultured or politically pivotal nations. Muhammad, however, was born in the year 570, in the city of Mecca, in southern Arabia, at that time a backward area of the world, far from the centers of trade, art, and learning. Orphaned at age six, he was reared in modest surroundings. Islamic tradition tells us that he was illiterate. His economic position improved when, at age twenty-five, he married a wealthy widow. Nevertheless, as he approached forty, there was little outward indication that he was a remarkable person. Most Arabs at that time were pagans, who believed in many gods. There were, however, in Mecca, a small number of Jews and Christians; it was from them no doubt that Muhammad first learned of a single, omnipotent God who ruled the entire universe. When he was forty years old, Muhammad became convinced that this one true God (Allah) was speaking to him, and had chosen him to spread the true faith. For three years, Muhammad preached only to close friends and associates. Then, about 613, he began preaching in public. As he slowly gained converts, the Meccan authorities came to consider him a dangerous nuisance. In 622, fearing for his safety, Muhammad fled to Medina (a city some 200 miles north of Mecca), where he had been offered a position of considerable political power. This flight, called the Hegira, was the turning point of the Prophet's life. In Mecca, he had had few followers. In Medina, he had many more, and he soon acquired an influence that made him a virtual dictator. During the next few years, while Muhammad's following grew rapidly, a series of battles were fought between Medina and Mecca. This was ended in 630 with Muhammad's triumphant return to Mecca as conqueror. The remaining two and one-half years of his life witnessed the rapid conversion of the Arab tribes to the new religion.
When Muhammad died, in 632, he was the effective ruler of all of southern Arabia. The Bedouin tribesmen of Arabia had a reputation as fierce warriors. But their number was small; and plagued by disunity and internecine warfare, they had been no match for the larger armies of the kingdoms in the settled agricultural areas to the north. However, unified by Muhammad for the first time in history, and inspired by their fervent belief in the one true God, these small Arab armies now embarked upon one of the most astonishing series of conquests in human history. To the northeast of Arabia lay the large Neo-Persian Empire of the Sassanids; to the northwest lay the Byzantine, or Eastern Roman Empire, centered in Constantinople. Numerically, the Arabs were no match for their opponents. On the field of battle, though, the inspired Arabs rapidly conquered all of Mesopotamia, Syria, and Palestine. By 642, Egypt had been wrested from the Byzantine Empire, while the Persian armies had been crushed at the key battles of Qadisiya in 637, and Nehavend in 642. But even these enormous conquests, which were made under the leadership of Muhammad's close friends and immediate successors, Ali, Abu Bakr and 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, did not mark the end of the Arab advance. By 711, the Arab armies had swept completely across North Africa to the Atlantic Ocean There they turned north and, crossing the Strait of Gibraltar, overwhelmed the Visigothic kingdom in Spain.
For a while, it must have seemed that the Moslems would overwhelm all of Christian Europe. However, in 732, at the famous Battle of Tours, a Moslem army, which had advanced into the center of France, was at last defeated by the Franks. Nevertheless, in a scant century of fighting, these Bedouin tribesmen, inspired by the word of the Prophet, had carved out an empire stretching from the borders of India to the Atlantic Ocean-the largest empire that the world had yet seen. And everywhere that the armies conquered, large-scale conversion to the new faith eventually followed. Now, not all of these conquests proved permanent. The Persians, though they have remained faithful to the religion of the Prophet, have since regained their independence from the Arabs. And in Spain, more than seven centuries of warfare, finally resulted in the Christians reconquering the entire peninsula. However, Mesopotamia and Egypt, the two cradles of ancient civilization, have remained Moslem, as has the entire coast of North Africa. The new religion, of course, continued to spread, in the intervening centuries, far beyond the borders of the original Moslem conquests. Currently it has tens of millions of adherents in Africa and Central Asia and even more in Pakistan and northern India, and in Indonesia. In Indonesia, the new faith has been a unifying factor. In the Indian subcontinent, however, the conflict between Moslems and Hindus is still a major obstacle to unity.
How, then, is one to assess the overall impact of Muhammad on human history? Like all religions, Islam exerts an enormous influence upon the lives of its followers. It is for this reason that the founders of the world's great religions all figure prominently in this book. Since there are roughly twice as many Christians as Moslems in the world, it may initially seem strange that Muhammad has been ranked higher than Jesus. There are two principal reasons for that decision. First, Muhammad played a far more important role in the development of Islam than Jesus did in the development of Christianity. Although Jesus was responsible for the main ethical and moral precepts of Christianity (insofar as these differed from Judaism), St. Paul was the main developer of Christian theology, its principal proselytizer, and the author of a large portion of the New Testament. Muhammad, however, was responsible for both the theology of Islam and its main ethical and moral principles. In addition, he played the key role in proselytizing the new faith, and in establishing the religious practices of Islam. Moreover, he is the author of the Moslem holy scriptures, the Koran, a collection of certain of Muhammad's insights that he believed had been directly revealed to him by Allah. Most of these utterances were copied more or less faithfully during Muhammad's lifetime and were collected together in authoritative form not long after his death. The Koran therefore, closely represents Muhammad's ideas and teachings and to a considerable extent his exact words. No such detailed compilation of the teachings of Christ has survived. Since the Koran is at least as important to Moslems as the Bible is to Christians, the influence of Muhammad through the medium of the Koran has been enormous. It is probable that the relative influence of Muhammad on Islam has been larger than the combined influence of Jesus Christ and St. Paul on Christianity.
On the purely religious level, then, it seems likely that Muhammad has been as influential in human history as Jesus. Furthermore, Muhammad (unlike Jesus) was a secular as well as a religious leader. In fact, as the driving force behind the Arab conquests, he may well rank as the most influential political leader of all time. Of many important historical events, one might say that they were inevitable and would have occurred even without the particular political leader who guided them. For example, the South American colonies would probably have won their independence from Spain even if Simon Bolivar had never lived. But this cannot be said of the Arab conquests. Nothing similar had occurred before Muhammad, and there is no reason to believe that the conquests would have been achieved without him. The only comparable conquests in human history are those of the Mongols in the thirteenth century, which were primarily due to the influence of Genghis Khan. These conquests, however, though more extensive than those of the Arabs, did not prove permanent, and today the only areas occupied by the Mongols are those that they held prior to the time of Genghis Khan. It is far different with the conquests of the Arabs. From Iraq to Morocco, there extends a whole chain of Moslem nations united not merely by their faith in Islam, but also by their Arabic language, history, and culture.
The centrality of the Koran in the Moslem religion and the fact that it is written in Arabic have probably prevented the Arab language from breaking up into mutually unintelligible dialects, which might otherwise have occurred in the intervening thirteen centuries. Differences and divisions between these Arab states exist, of course, and they are considerable, but the partial disunity should not blind us to the important elements of unity that have continued to exist. For instance, neither Iran nor Indonesia, both oil-producing states and both Islamic in religion joined in the oil embargo of the winter of 1973-74. It is no coincidence that all of the Arab states, and only the Arab states, participated in the embargo. We see, then, that the Arab conquests of the seventh century have continued to play an important role in human history, down to the present day. It is this unparalleled combination of secular and religious influence which I feel entitles Muhammad to be considered the most influential single figure in human history.
________________________________________
The following is from Michael Hart's book and lists Prophet Muhammad as the most influential man in History. A Citadel Press Book, published by Carol Publishing Group
Ranking, list of 100 most influential persons in history:
1. Prophet Muhammad
2. Isaac Newton
3. Jesus Christ
4. Buddha
5. Confucius
6. St. Paul
7. Ts'ai Lun
8. Johann Gutenberg
9. Christopher Columbus
10. Albert Einstein
11. Karl Marx
12. Louis Pasteur
13. Galileo Galilei
14. Aristotle
15. Lenin
16. Moses
17. Charles Darwin
18. Shih Huang Ti
19. Augustus Caesar
20. Mao Tse-tung
21. Genghis Khan
22. Euclid
23. Martin Luther
24. Nicolaus Copernicus
25. James Watt
26. Constantine the Great
27. George Washington
28. Michael Faraday
29. James Clerk Maxwell
30. Orville Wright and Wilbur Wright
31. Antoine Laurent Lavoisier
32. Sigmund Freud
33. Alexander the Great
34. Napoleon Bonaparte
35. Adolf Hitler
36. William Shakespeare
37. Adam Smith
38. Thomas Edison
39. Anthony van Leeuwenhoek
40. Plato
41. Guglielmo Marconi
42. Ludwig van Beethoven
43. Werner Heisenberb
44. Alexander Graham Bell
45. Alexander Fleming
46. Simon Bolivar
47. Oliver Cromwell
48. John Locke
49. Michelangelo
50. Pope Urban II
51. Umar ibn al-Khattab
52. Asoka
53. St. Augustine
54. Max Planck
55. John Calvin
56. William T.G. Morton
57. William Harvey
58. Antoine Henri Becquerel
59. Gregor Mendel
60. Joseph Lister
61. Nikolaus August Otto
62. Louis Daguerre
63. Joseph Stalin
64. Rene Descartes
65. Julius Caesar
66. Francisco Pizarro
67. Hernando Cortes
68. Queen Isabella I
69. William the Conqueror
70. Thomas Jefferson
71. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
72. Edward Jenner
73. Wilhelm Conrad Rontgen
74. Hohann Sebastian Bach
75. Lao Tzu
76. Enrico Fermi
77. Thomas Malthus
78. Francis Bacon
79. Voltaire
80. John F. Kennedy
81. Gregory Pincus
82. Sui Wen Ti
83. Mani
84. Vasco da Gama
85. Charlemagne
86. Cyprus the Great
87. Leonhard Euler
88. Niccolo Machiavelli
89. Zoroaster
90. Menes
91. Peter the Great
92. Mencius
93. John Dalton
94. Homer
95. Queen Elizabeth
96. Justinian I
97. fJohannes Kepler
98. Pablo Picasso
99. Mahavira
100. Niels Bohr
from the book by Michael Hart
The following is from Michael Hart's book and lists Prophet Muhammad as the most influential man in History. A Citadel Press Book, published by Carol Publishing Group
Ranking of the twenty from the list of 100:
1. Prophet Muhammad
2. Isaac Newton
3. Jesus Christ
4. Buddha
5. Confucius
6. St. Paul
7. Ts'ai Lun
8. Johann Gutenberg
9. Christopher Columbus
10. Albert Einstein
11. Karl Marx
12. Louis Pasteur
13. Galileo Galilei
14. Aristotle
15. Lenin
16. Moses
17. Charles Darwin
18. Shih Huang Ti
19. Augustus Caesar
20. Mao Tse-tung
________________________________________
MUHAMMAD, No. 1
The 100, a Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History
by Michael H. Hart
My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels. Of humble origins, Muhammad founded and promulgated one of the world's great religions, and became an immensely effective political leader. Today, thirteen centuries after his death, his influence is still powerful and pervasive. The majority of the persons in this book had the advantage of being born and raised in centers of civilization, highly cultured or politically pivotal nations. Muhammad, however, was born in the year 570, in the city of Mecca, in southern Arabia, at that time a backward area of the world, far from the centers of trade, art, and learning. Orphaned at age six, he was reared in modest surroundings. Islamic tradition tells us that he was illiterate. His economic position improved when, at age twenty-five, he married a wealthy widow. Nevertheless, as he approached forty, there was little outward indication that he was a remarkable person. Most Arabs at that time were pagans, who believed in many gods. There were, however, in Mecca, a small number of Jews and Christians; it was from them no doubt that Muhammad first learned of a single, omnipotent God who ruled the entire universe. When he was forty years old, Muhammad became convinced that this one true God (Allah) was speaking to him, and had chosen him to spread the true faith. For three years, Muhammad preached only to close friends and associates. Then, about 613, he began preaching in public. As he slowly gained converts, the Meccan authorities came to consider him a dangerous nuisance. In 622, fearing for his safety, Muhammad fled to Medina (a city some 200 miles north of Mecca), where he had been offered a position of considerable political power. This flight, called the Hegira, was the turning point of the Prophet's life. In Mecca, he had had few followers. In Medina, he had many more, and he soon acquired an influence that made him a virtual dictator. During the next few years, while Muhammad's following grew rapidly, a series of battles were fought between Medina and Mecca. This was ended in 630 with Muhammad's triumphant return to Mecca as conqueror. The remaining two and one-half years of his life witnessed the rapid conversion of the Arab tribes to the new religion.
When Muhammad died, in 632, he was the effective ruler of all of southern Arabia. The Bedouin tribesmen of Arabia had a reputation as fierce warriors. But their number was small; and plagued by disunity and internecine warfare, they had been no match for the larger armies of the kingdoms in the settled agricultural areas to the north. However, unified by Muhammad for the first time in history, and inspired by their fervent belief in the one true God, these small Arab armies now embarked upon one of the most astonishing series of conquests in human history. To the northeast of Arabia lay the large Neo-Persian Empire of the Sassanids; to the northwest lay the Byzantine, or Eastern Roman Empire, centered in Constantinople. Numerically, the Arabs were no match for their opponents. On the field of battle, though, the inspired Arabs rapidly conquered all of Mesopotamia, Syria, and Palestine. By 642, Egypt had been wrested from the Byzantine Empire, while the Persian armies had been crushed at the key battles of Qadisiya in 637, and Nehavend in 642. But even these enormous conquests, which were made under the leadership of Muhammad's close friends and immediate successors, Ali, Abu Bakr and 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, did not mark the end of the Arab advance. By 711, the Arab armies had swept completely across North Africa to the Atlantic Ocean There they turned north and, crossing the Strait of Gibraltar, overwhelmed the Visigothic kingdom in Spain.
For a while, it must have seemed that the Moslems would overwhelm all of Christian Europe. However, in 732, at the famous Battle of Tours, a Moslem army, which had advanced into the center of France, was at last defeated by the Franks. Nevertheless, in a scant century of fighting, these Bedouin tribesmen, inspired by the word of the Prophet, had carved out an empire stretching from the borders of India to the Atlantic Ocean-the largest empire that the world had yet seen. And everywhere that the armies conquered, large-scale conversion to the new faith eventually followed. Now, not all of these conquests proved permanent. The Persians, though they have remained faithful to the religion of the Prophet, have since regained their independence from the Arabs. And in Spain, more than seven centuries of warfare, finally resulted in the Christians reconquering the entire peninsula. However, Mesopotamia and Egypt, the two cradles of ancient civilization, have remained Moslem, as has the entire coast of North Africa. The new religion, of course, continued to spread, in the intervening centuries, far beyond the borders of the original Moslem conquests. Currently it has tens of millions of adherents in Africa and Central Asia and even more in Pakistan and northern India, and in Indonesia. In Indonesia, the new faith has been a unifying factor. In the Indian subcontinent, however, the conflict between Moslems and Hindus is still a major obstacle to unity.
How, then, is one to assess the overall impact of Muhammad on human history? Like all religions, Islam exerts an enormous influence upon the lives of its followers. It is for this reason that the founders of the world's great religions all figure prominently in this book. Since there are roughly twice as many Christians as Moslems in the world, it may initially seem strange that Muhammad has been ranked higher than Jesus. There are two principal reasons for that decision. First, Muhammad played a far more important role in the development of Islam than Jesus did in the development of Christianity. Although Jesus was responsible for the main ethical and moral precepts of Christianity (insofar as these differed from Judaism), St. Paul was the main developer of Christian theology, its principal proselytizer, and the author of a large portion of the New Testament. Muhammad, however, was responsible for both the theology of Islam and its main ethical and moral principles. In addition, he played the key role in proselytizing the new faith, and in establishing the religious practices of Islam. Moreover, he is the author of the Moslem holy scriptures, the Koran, a collection of certain of Muhammad's insights that he believed had been directly revealed to him by Allah. Most of these utterances were copied more or less faithfully during Muhammad's lifetime and were collected together in authoritative form not long after his death. The Koran therefore, closely represents Muhammad's ideas and teachings and to a considerable extent his exact words. No such detailed compilation of the teachings of Christ has survived. Since the Koran is at least as important to Moslems as the Bible is to Christians, the influence of Muhammad through the medium of the Koran has been enormous. It is probable that the relative influence of Muhammad on Islam has been larger than the combined influence of Jesus Christ and St. Paul on Christianity.
On the purely religious level, then, it seems likely that Muhammad has been as influential in human history as Jesus. Furthermore, Muhammad (unlike Jesus) was a secular as well as a religious leader. In fact, as the driving force behind the Arab conquests, he may well rank as the most influential political leader of all time. Of many important historical events, one might say that they were inevitable and would have occurred even without the particular political leader who guided them. For example, the South American colonies would probably have won their independence from Spain even if Simon Bolivar had never lived. But this cannot be said of the Arab conquests. Nothing similar had occurred before Muhammad, and there is no reason to believe that the conquests would have been achieved without him. The only comparable conquests in human history are those of the Mongols in the thirteenth century, which were primarily due to the influence of Genghis Khan. These conquests, however, though more extensive than those of the Arabs, did not prove permanent, and today the only areas occupied by the Mongols are those that they held prior to the time of Genghis Khan. It is far different with the conquests of the Arabs. From Iraq to Morocco, there extends a whole chain of Moslem nations united not merely by their faith in Islam, but also by their Arabic language, history, and culture.
The centrality of the Koran in the Moslem religion and the fact that it is written in Arabic have probably prevented the Arab language from breaking up into mutually unintelligible dialects, which might otherwise have occurred in the intervening thirteen centuries. Differences and divisions between these Arab states exist, of course, and they are considerable, but the partial disunity should not blind us to the important elements of unity that have continued to exist. For instance, neither Iran nor Indonesia, both oil-producing states and both Islamic in religion joined in the oil embargo of the winter of 1973-74. It is no coincidence that all of the Arab states, and only the Arab states, participated in the embargo. We see, then, that the Arab conquests of the seventh century have continued to play an important role in human history, down to the present day. It is this unparalleled combination of secular and religious influence which I feel entitles Muhammad to be considered the most influential single figure in human history.
________________________________________
The following is from Michael Hart's book and lists Prophet Muhammad as the most influential man in History. A Citadel Press Book, published by Carol Publishing Group
Ranking, list of 100 most influential persons in history:
1. Prophet Muhammad
2. Isaac Newton
3. Jesus Christ
4. Buddha
5. Confucius
6. St. Paul
7. Ts'ai Lun
8. Johann Gutenberg
9. Christopher Columbus
10. Albert Einstein
11. Karl Marx
12. Louis Pasteur
13. Galileo Galilei
14. Aristotle
15. Lenin
16. Moses
17. Charles Darwin
18. Shih Huang Ti
19. Augustus Caesar
20. Mao Tse-tung
21. Genghis Khan
22. Euclid
23. Martin Luther
24. Nicolaus Copernicus
25. James Watt
26. Constantine the Great
27. George Washington
28. Michael Faraday
29. James Clerk Maxwell
30. Orville Wright and Wilbur Wright
31. Antoine Laurent Lavoisier
32. Sigmund Freud
33. Alexander the Great
34. Napoleon Bonaparte
35. Adolf Hitler
36. William Shakespeare
37. Adam Smith
38. Thomas Edison
39. Anthony van Leeuwenhoek
40. Plato
41. Guglielmo Marconi
42. Ludwig van Beethoven
43. Werner Heisenberb
44. Alexander Graham Bell
45. Alexander Fleming
46. Simon Bolivar
47. Oliver Cromwell
48. John Locke
49. Michelangelo
50. Pope Urban II
51. Umar ibn al-Khattab
52. Asoka
53. St. Augustine
54. Max Planck
55. John Calvin
56. William T.G. Morton
57. William Harvey
58. Antoine Henri Becquerel
59. Gregor Mendel
60. Joseph Lister
61. Nikolaus August Otto
62. Louis Daguerre
63. Joseph Stalin
64. Rene Descartes
65. Julius Caesar
66. Francisco Pizarro
67. Hernando Cortes
68. Queen Isabella I
69. William the Conqueror
70. Thomas Jefferson
71. Jean-Jacques Rousseau
72. Edward Jenner
73. Wilhelm Conrad Rontgen
74. Hohann Sebastian Bach
75. Lao Tzu
76. Enrico Fermi
77. Thomas Malthus
78. Francis Bacon
79. Voltaire
80. John F. Kennedy
81. Gregory Pincus
82. Sui Wen Ti
83. Mani
84. Vasco da Gama
85. Charlemagne
86. Cyprus the Great
87. Leonhard Euler
88. Niccolo Machiavelli
89. Zoroaster
90. Menes
91. Peter the Great
92. Mencius
93. John Dalton
94. Homer
95. Queen Elizabeth
96. Justinian I
97. fJohannes Kepler
98. Pablo Picasso
99. Mahavira
100. Niels Bohr
Azul- Nombre de messages : 29959
Date d'inscription : 09/07/2008
Re: Un article du directeur de Liberté sur "Le mensonge de Dieu"
vive notre prophéte ,vive notre religion!!!!
Sujets similaires
» Lisez "Le mensonge de Dieu", monsieur le ministre !
» Le directeur du quotidien "Liberté" tire la sonnette d'alarme
» Lettre adressée au Directeur de "Liberté" sur la non publication du droit de réponse du MAK
» la liberté ,vous avez dit liberté ,HAHAHAHAHA ,une autre blague marron!!!!
» L'Hypocrisie ,sournoiserie ,mensonge ...!
» Le directeur du quotidien "Liberté" tire la sonnette d'alarme
» Lettre adressée au Directeur de "Liberté" sur la non publication du droit de réponse du MAK
» la liberté ,vous avez dit liberté ,HAHAHAHAHA ,une autre blague marron!!!!
» L'Hypocrisie ,sournoiserie ,mensonge ...!
Page 1 sur 1
Permission de ce forum:
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum